<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Managed Linux server profesionals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxprof.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxprof.com</link>
	<description>First stop Linux server source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 19:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Certified Linux based servers for hosting Oracle database</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/certified-linux-based-servers-for-hosting-oracle-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/certified-linux-based-servers-for-hosting-oracle-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are only two Oracle certified operating systems that support hosting Oracle DB:

SLES (Novell Suse Enterprise)
Redhat (Enterprise Linux)

I have been using both OSes to hosting Oracle DB and so far it&#8217;s been working great. My personal choice would be Redhat, but I know you can get better pricing and features (from the licensing point of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only two Oracle certified operating systems that support hosting Oracle DB:</p>
<ul>
<li>SLES (Novell Suse Enterprise)</li>
<li>Redhat (Enterprise Linux)</li>
</ul>
<p>I have been using both OSes to hosting Oracle DB and so far it&#8217;s been working great. My personal choice would be Redhat, but I know you can get better pricing and features (from the licensing point of view) with Novell&#8230; if you know how to deal with these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/certified-linux-based-servers-for-hosting-oracle-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Register Suse Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) via command line</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/register-suse-linux-enterprise-server-sles-via-command-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/register-suse-linux-enterprise-server-sles-via-command-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To speed up your new Suse Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) install process and register your new box with Novell Center I suggest using a quick command line:
suse_register -a email=&#8221;your@emailaddresshere.com&#8221; -a regcode-sles=&#8221;REGCODE&#8221;
REGCODE is your Suse registration code (e.g. Order code), usually consists of 14 characters.
You must be root to execute this command and make sure you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To speed up your new Suse Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) install process and register your new box with Novell Center I suggest using a quick command line:</p>
<blockquote><p>suse_register -a email=&#8221;your@emailaddresshere.com&#8221; -a regcode-sles=&#8221;REGCODE&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>REGCODE is your Suse registration code (e.g. Order code), usually consists of 14 characters.</p>
<p>You must be root to execute this command and make sure you network configuration is set-up and your server on-line. After registration you can start server updating process via Yast or rug command line. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/register-suse-linux-enterprise-server-sles-via-command-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xen for Virtual Private Server environment</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/xen-for-virtual-private-server-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/xen-for-virtual-private-server-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xen is really good for running Virtual Private Servers with root access and dedicated RAM. It&#8217;s a true virtualization platform that offers multiple local root servers on one physical server hardware. With XEN VPS you get your own virtual server with fully dedicated memory (RAM), process list, file system and a share of central hardware [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xen is really good for running Virtual Private Servers with root access and dedicated RAM. It&#8217;s a true virtualization platform that offers multiple local root servers on one physical server hardware. With XEN VPS you get your own virtual server with fully dedicated memory (RAM), process list, file system and a share of central hardware CPU.</p>
<p>  Xen Virtual Private Server is perfect for sites that require custom software installation, or even custom daemon configuration that canāt be run on a shared server. Plus, VPS offers better security because you have your own file system that is not shared with other web sites.</p>
<p>  However, VPS is a like a small dedicated server &#8211; you will probably need skills to manage it. I suggest you read some Linux books and on-line manuals to get familiar with it, otherwise someone may compromise your VPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/xen-for-virtual-private-server-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Centos, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Suse or Fedora</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/centos-freebsd-gentoo-suse-or-fedora/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/centos-freebsd-gentoo-suse-or-fedora/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many folks ask us what is the best platform/OS for web hosting platform? Is it Centos, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Suse or Fedora. While, Centos, FreeBSD, Fedora is more common in USA, SUSE beats deployment statistics in Europe &#8211; Germany. Finding Suse and Gento from USA dedicated server companies is somewhat tricky. I am of course not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many folks ask us what is the best platform/OS for web hosting platform? Is it Centos, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Suse or Fedora. While, Centos, FreeBSD, Fedora is more common in USA, SUSE beats deployment statistics in Europe &#8211; Germany. Finding Suse and Gento from USA dedicated server companies is somewhat tricky. I am of course not speaking about virtual private servers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like much Fedora either because of quick end-of-life (EOF) for updates and upgrading usually costs money, requires downtime and somewhat complex for novice users. So we have rounded down to Centos Linux or FreeBSD. Very good, let&#8217;s continue.</p>
<p>FreeBSD is powerful BSD oriented operating system, very reliable, secure (of course if you update it as all other OS) and scalable. Centos is a Redhat Enterprise whitebox clone that is reliable and easy to keep updated due to YUM interface. Much longer EOF comparing to Fedora makes it a much better choice.</p>
<p>While I am more oriented towards Linux &#8211; Centos would be my choice of the best OS from the list above, however if you are BSD savvy user &#8211; more Unix oriented, go for FreeBSD &#8211; it&#8217;s powerful, IO-fast, high performance box you could count on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/centos-freebsd-gentoo-suse-or-fedora/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running traceroute on the Windows OS</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/running-traceroute-on-the-windows-os/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/running-traceroute-on-the-windows-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/running-traceroute-on-the-windows-os/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, in order to run traceroute on the Windows box you need to launch a command prompt or DOS console.
Type ‘cmd’ and hit enter in Start->Run
To run Traceroute under the Windows you must use traceroute’s command line utility

tracert
traceroute help:
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert
Usage: tracert [-d] [-h maximum_hops] [-j host-list] [-w timeout] target_name
Options:
-d Do not resolve addresses to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, in order to run traceroute on the Windows box you need to launch a command prompt or DOS console.</p>
<blockquote><p>Type ‘cmd’ and hit enter in Start->Run</p>
<p>To run Traceroute under the Windows you must use traceroute’s command line utility</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>tracert</p></blockquote>
<p>traceroute help:</p>
<p>C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert</p>
<p>Usage: tracert [-d] [-h maximum_hops] [-j host-list] [-w timeout] target_name</p>
<p>Options:<br />
-d Do not resolve addresses to hostnames.<br />
-h maximum_hops Maximum number of hops to search for target.<br />
-j host-list Loose source route along host-list.<br />
-w timeout Wait timeout milliseconds for each reply.</p>
<p>for example to trace the network path to host host.net you should enter</p>
<blockquote><p>tracert host.net</p></blockquote>
<p>and hit enter. Voila <img src='http://www.linuxprof.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/running-traceroute-on-the-windows-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mailscanner and default Spamassassin fills up /var space</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/mailscanner-and-default-spamassassin-fills-up-var-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/mailscanner-and-default-spamassassin-fills-up-var-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/mailscanner-and-default-spamassassin-fills-up-var-space/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are installing Mailscanner and Spamassassin from source or some RPMs it&#8217;s been know to use Bayesian statistics engine with it&#8217;s database kept forever. This fills up /var/spool/MailScanner/spamassassin folder pretty quickly if you have a moderate load SMTP incoming server. To fix this problem and rebuild Bayesian filters you need to change the following [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are installing Mailscanner and Spamassassin from source or some RPMs it&#8217;s been know to use Bayesian statistics engine with it&#8217;s database kept forever. This fills up /var/spool/MailScanner/spamassassin folder pretty quickly if you have a moderate load SMTP incoming server. To fix this problem and rebuild Bayesian filters you need to change the following value in /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf file</p>
<p>find the following setting:</p>
<p><em>Rebuild Bayes Every = 0</em></p>
<p>and replace it with</p>
<p><em>Rebuild Bayes Every = 12000</em></p>
<p>This will rebuild Bayesian spamassassin database/files every 200 minutes. You can of course aim for a higher value if you have enough disk space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/mailscanner-and-default-spamassassin-fills-up-var-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Syn cookies performance and memory</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/linux-syn-cookies-performance-and-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/linux-syn-cookies-performance-and-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/linux-syn-cookies-performance-and-memory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been playing around with Linux syn cookies to test out the performance and we have came to the following conclusions.
It&#8217;s always good to detect SYN floods and then turn on SYN cookies to better use the CPU power &#8211; so the SYN flood must be detected and sysctl SYN cookie value set to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been playing around with Linux syn cookies to test out the performance and we have came to the following conclusions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always good to detect SYN floods and then turn on SYN cookies to better use the CPU power &#8211; so the SYN flood must be detected and sysctl SYN cookie value set to 1 in the real time. If you have Syn cookies turned on you server CPU and Network stack will be slightly affected, however, no RAM usage will increase in case of SYN flood. The kernel does not allocate the TCP buffers unless there is a positive reply to ACK/SYN packet.<br />
So if you have a dual core box with 1GB RAM and good enough connectivity, you can leave Syn Cookies enabled without much of the performance loss, even if you get quite decent legitimate traffic.</p>
<p>Sysctl Syn cookie protection for Linux can be activated in real time, by:<br />
<em>sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=1 </em></p>
<p>You can also increase Syn backlog, to let&#8217;s say 1536:<br />
<em>sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=1536</em></p>
<p>For FreeBSD you can tune TCP queue length by issuing:<br />
<em>sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=1024</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/linux-syn-cookies-performance-and-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High bandwidth blog hosting, load balancing, clustering and failover</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/high-bandwidth-blog-hosting-load-balancing-clustering-and-failover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/high-bandwidth-blog-hosting-load-balancing-clustering-and-failover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cluster hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load balanced hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/high-bandwidth-blog-hosting-load-balancing-clustering-and-failover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are hundreds of blogs that have a lot of daily visitors and require dedicated server custom set-ups to run quickly and without a delay. Many of these blogs quickly outgrow single hardware resources, even if you try to upgrade the server and add more memory, even if you upgrade it to very expensive hardware. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are hundreds of blogs that have a lot of daily visitors and require dedicated server custom set-ups to run quickly and without a delay. Many of these blogs quickly outgrow single hardware resources, even if you try to upgrade the server and add more memory, even if you upgrade it to very expensive hardware. It simply doesn&#8217;t work and you require more advanced set-up, like front-ends and back-ends that share the load at all levels.</p>
<p>We have seen companies offering one front-end and one back-end MySQL server. Usually, they are run by people who never ran the blogs themselves, thus, no experience and skills required for such set-ups. Load balancing is not that easy, assuming you even know what data synchronization and database replication, or master-slave configuration means. Some &#8220;experts&#8221; will say round-robin is the key for the load balancing, but we know it is not. You need more complex and more advanced load balancing that works and delivers. You need complex solutions that can easily handle &#8220;slashdot&#8221; and digg effect &#8211; withstand heavy and high load hits when your site is getting hammered by real visitors.</p>
<p>At this time, there are not that many companies offering cluster and <a href="http://www.linuxadmin.org/blog-managed-hosting.php">true load balancing blog hosting</a>. Multiple front-end boxes and back-end database server data must be kept up to date at any time and quickly responding, otherwise this doesn&#8217;t simply make a sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/high-bandwidth-blog-hosting-load-balancing-clustering-and-failover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managed server or unmanaged?</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxprof.com/managed-server-or-unmanaged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxprof.com/managed-server-or-unmanaged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 13:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managed servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxprof.com/managed-server-or-unmanaged/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many guys who ask this question and the answer is not that easy. If you have a real understanding of how Linux or FreeBSD works, you can sure use your skills and apply for unmanaged server. By using unmanaged server you save some bucks and have full control over the server.
But not many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many guys who ask this question and the answer is not that easy. If you have a real understanding of how Linux or FreeBSD works, you can sure use your skills and apply for unmanaged server. By using unmanaged server you save some bucks and have full control over the server.</p>
<p>But not many know how to properly configure and run server platforms, thus, managed dedicated servers are better choice. However, it will cost you much more &#8211; there are some management companies that offer service from $30 and up to $500 per month. Starting from standard OS patching and upgrades, and ending with Apache recompilation and adding modules and tunning the platform for better reliability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxprof.com/managed-server-or-unmanaged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
